Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The High Court held that the pre-deposits made by the petitioners through their electronic cash ledger were valid u/s 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court followed the decision in RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and directed the appellate authority to accept the pre-deposits as valid and dispose of the petitioners' appeal on merits in accordance with the law. The petition was allowed.
The High Court held that the pre-deposits made by the petitioners through their electronic cash ledger were valid u/s 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court followed the decision in RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and directed the appellate authority to accept the pre-deposits as valid and dispose of the petitioners' appeal on merits in accordance with the law. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
