Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court Validates E-Cash Ledger Pre-Deposits, Orders Fast-Tracked Appeal Process for Finance Act Cases.</h1> <h3>M/s In Net India Pvt. Ltd., Chembond Chemicals Limited Versus Union of India, The Commissioner of Central Tax & Central Excise, Raigarh (Appeals) Navi Mumbai, Joint Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Navi Mumbai.</h3> The High Court of Bombay determined that pre-deposits made through the electronic cash ledger under the Finance Act, 1994, are valid. Consequently, the ... Validity of pre-deposits made by the petitioners through their electronic cash ledger - Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HELD THAT:- The issue raised in these petitions is covered by the decision of the Coordinate Bench in RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [2022 (8) TMI 1053 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]. Ultimately, the record shows that the petitioners made pre-deposits, whether in one form or another. Accepting the respondents’ hyper-technical contention would only mean that the respondents would have to be directed to refund the amount of pre-deposits made by the petitioners so that the petitioners could once again deposit the same amount to the appeal account. The appellate authority are directed to accept the pre-deposits made as valid pre-deposits and dispose of the petitioners’ appeal on the merits and in accordance with the law - petition allowed. The High Court of Bombay heard two petitions regarding the validity of pre-deposits made through electronic cash ledger under the Finance Act, 1994. The court found that the pre-deposits were valid, quashed the appeal orders, and remanded the matter to the appellate authority for further action. The decision was based on a previous case and the court directed the authority to handle the appeals promptly.