Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The High Court held that the pre-deposits made by the petitioners through their electronic cash ledger were valid u/s 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court followed the decision in RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and directed the appellate authority to accept the pre-deposits as valid and dispose of the petitioners' appeal on merits in accordance with the law. The petition was allowed.
The High Court held that the pre-deposits made by the petitioners through their electronic cash ledger were valid u/s 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court followed the decision in RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and directed the appellate authority to accept the pre-deposits as valid and dispose of the petitioners' appeal on merits in accordance with the law. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
