Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The High Court held that the pre-deposits made by the petitioners through their electronic cash ledger were valid u/s 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court followed the decision in RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and directed the appellate authority to accept the pre-deposits as valid and dispose of the petitioners' appeal on merits in accordance with the law. The petition was allowed.
The High Court held that the pre-deposits made by the petitioners through their electronic cash ledger were valid u/s 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court followed the decision in RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and directed the appellate authority to accept the pre-deposits as valid and dispose of the petitioners' appeal on merits in accordance with the law. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
