Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal rendered the following decision: The assessee, engaged in textile and grey business with a turnover exceeding Rs. 1 crore, made cash deposits during the demonetization period. Considering the business nature and inability to substantiate the entire source, 20% of the total cash deposit was treated as unexplained income, taxable at normal rates, while the remaining 80% was deleted. Regarding sundry creditors addition, the Tribunal directed deletion due to lack of verification by lower authorities despite the assessee providing account confirmations and sample purchase bills. The 10% ad hoc disallowance of expenses was upheld as the assessee did not offer income u/s 44AD, and the disallowance ratio was reasonable considering the nature of expenses.
The Appellate Tribunal rendered the following decision: The assessee, engaged in textile and grey business with a turnover exceeding Rs. 1 crore, made cash deposits during the demonetization period. Considering the business nature and inability to substantiate the entire source, 20% of the total cash deposit was treated as unexplained income, taxable at normal rates, while the remaining 80% was deleted. Regarding sundry creditors addition, the Tribunal directed deletion due to lack of verification by lower authorities despite the assessee providing account confirmations and sample purchase bills. The 10% ad hoc disallowance of expenses was upheld as the assessee did not offer income u/s 44AD, and the disallowance ratio was reasonable considering the nature of expenses.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
