<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules 20% of Cash Deposits Taxable for Textile Firm; Deletes Sundry Creditor Additions; Upholds 10% Expense Disallowance.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83571</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal rendered the following decision: The assessee, engaged in textile and grey business with a turnover exceeding Rs. 1 crore, made cash deposits during the demonetization period. Considering the business nature and inability to substantiate the entire source, 20% of the total cash deposit was treated as unexplained income, taxable at normal rates, while the remaining 80% was deleted. Regarding sundry creditors addition, the Tribunal directed deletion due to lack of verification by lower authorities despite the assessee providing account confirmations and sample purchase bills. The 10% ad hoc disallowance of expenses was upheld as the assessee did not offer income u/s 44AD, and the disallowance ratio was reasonable considering the nature of expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:53:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=780166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules 20% of Cash Deposits Taxable for Textile Firm; Deletes Sundry Creditor Additions; Upholds 10% Expense Disallowance.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83571</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal rendered the following decision: The assessee, engaged in textile and grey business with a turnover exceeding Rs. 1 crore, made cash deposits during the demonetization period. Considering the business nature and inability to substantiate the entire source, 20% of the total cash deposit was treated as unexplained income, taxable at normal rates, while the remaining 80% was deleted. Regarding sundry creditors addition, the Tribunal directed deletion due to lack of verification by lower authorities despite the assessee providing account confirmations and sample purchase bills. The 10% ad hoc disallowance of expenses was upheld as the assessee did not offer income u/s 44AD, and the disallowance ratio was reasonable considering the nature of expenses.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 08:53:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>