Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that if there are bona fide reasons for deducting lower tax in the earlier months of the financial year, and the shortfall is rectified immediately upon noticing it, then Section 192(3) of the Income Tax Act would save the employer from liability to pay interest u/s 201(1A). Merely short deduction of tax at source from salaries paid to employees does not invoke Section 201(1A), unless the total tax deducted by the end of the year is less than the tax deductible from the salary paid to the employee in that year. The Tribunal also held that Section 220(2) interest is applicable only when amounts specified in the demand notice u/s 156 are not paid within the stipulated period, which was not the case here. Consequently, the levy of interest u/ss 201(1A) and 220(2) was deleted.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that if there are bona fide reasons for deducting lower tax in the earlier months of the financial year, and the shortfall is rectified immediately upon noticing it, then Section 192(3) of the Income Tax Act would save the employer from liability to pay interest u/s 201(1A). Merely short deduction of tax at source from salaries paid to employees does not invoke Section 201(1A), unless the total tax deducted by the end of the year is less than the tax deductible from the salary paid to the employee in that year. The Tribunal also held that Section 220(2) interest is applicable only when amounts specified in the demand notice u/s 156 are not paid within the stipulated period, which was not the case here. Consequently, the levy of interest u/ss 201(1A) and 220(2) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.