1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that if there are bona fide reasons for deducting lower tax in the earlier months of the financial year, and the shortfall is rectified immediately upon noticing it, then Section 192(3) of the Income Tax Act would save the employer from liability to pay interest u/s 201(1A). Merely short deduction of tax at source from salaries paid to employees does not invoke Section 201(1A), unless the total tax deducted by the end of the year is less than the tax deductible from the salary paid to the employee in that year. The Tribunal also held that Section 220(2) interest is applicable only when amounts specified in the demand notice u/s 156 are not paid within the stipulated period, which was not the case here. Consequently, the levy of interest u/ss 201(1A) and 220(2) was deleted.