Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The recipients were non-residents without any permanent establishment or business connection in India. The services were rendered outside India for which commission was paid, and the income accrued outside India. Consequently, no tax deduction at source (TDS) u/s 195 was liable to be made, and the disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) did not apply. The non-resident recipients had no presence or business activities in India, rendering their services entirely from abroad. Therefore, the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS, and the appeal was allowed.
The recipients were non-residents without any permanent establishment or business connection in India. The services were rendered outside India for which commission was paid, and the income accrued outside India. Consequently, no tax deduction at source (TDS) u/s 195 was liable to be made, and the disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) did not apply. The non-resident recipients had no presence or business activities in India, rendering their services entirely from abroad. Therefore, the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.