Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The High Court examined whether the assessee had constructed a residential house on agricultural land within the stipulated three-year period from the date of transfer of property to claim deduction u/s 54. The court held that the allowance is available if capital gains from the sale of a residential property are utilized for purchasing a residential property or constructing a residential house, implying raising a construction for inhabitation as a residential dwelling unit. The Inspector's report accepted by the ITAT revealed only makeshift guardrooms made of plywood sheets without electricity or water connection on the site. The court opined that putting together plywood sheets cannot be construed as constructing a residential house. The ITAT's findings were not perverse or manifestly erroneous, considering the description of the property. Therefore, no question of law arose for the court's consideration.
The High Court examined whether the assessee had constructed a residential house on agricultural land within the stipulated three-year period from the date of transfer of property to claim deduction u/s 54. The court held that the allowance is available if capital gains from the sale of a residential property are utilized for purchasing a residential property or constructing a residential house, implying raising a construction for inhabitation as a residential dwelling unit. The Inspector's report accepted by the ITAT revealed only makeshift guardrooms made of plywood sheets without electricity or water connection on the site. The court opined that putting together plywood sheets cannot be construed as constructing a residential house. The ITAT's findings were not perverse or manifestly erroneous, considering the description of the property. Therefore, no question of law arose for the court's consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.