Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Benefit under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 was considered for a case where no appeal, writ petition, or special leave petition was pending before the appellate forum as on the cut-off date, but a review petition against dismissal of the special leave petition was pending. The court held that even though the scope of a review petition is limited, it partakes the character of pending proceedings. The CBDT circulars clarified that pendency of arbitration proceedings and miscellaneous applications would meet the requirement u/s 2(1)(j) of the Act, even if no appeal was pending. The court ruled that the review petition would also be covered under the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme" as the DTVSV Act provides for deviation from strict application of tax laws to achieve its purpose. The impugned order rejecting the declaration was set aside, and the department was directed to accept the revised declaration form and process it under the DTVSV Act, 2020.
Benefit under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 was considered for a case where no appeal, writ petition, or special leave petition was pending before the appellate forum as on the cut-off date, but a review petition against dismissal of the special leave petition was pending. The court held that even though the scope of a review petition is limited, it partakes the character of pending proceedings. The CBDT circulars clarified that pendency of arbitration proceedings and miscellaneous applications would meet the requirement u/s 2(1)(j) of the Act, even if no appeal was pending. The court ruled that the review petition would also be covered under the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme" as the DTVSV Act provides for deviation from strict application of tax laws to achieve its purpose. The impugned order rejecting the declaration was set aside, and the department was directed to accept the revised declaration form and process it under the DTVSV Act, 2020.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
