Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (11) TMI 1107 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Review petition against dismissed SLP qualifies as pending proceedings under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act Section 2(1)(j) Delhi HC held that a review petition pending against dismissed SLP constitutes 'pending proceedings' under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, making ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Review petition against dismissed SLP qualifies as pending proceedings under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act Section 2(1)(j)

                            Delhi HC held that a review petition pending against dismissed SLP constitutes "pending proceedings" under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, making the petitioner eligible for scheme benefits. Court relied on CBDT circulars clarifying that arbitration proceedings and miscellaneous applications qualify under Section 2(1)(j) even without pending appeals. HC emphasized that departments are bound by their own circulars and cannot take contrary positions. The restrictive interpretation by tax authorities was deemed inconsistent with the scheme's purpose of providing tax dispute resolution. Writ petition was allowed, directing acceptance of petitioner's declaration form for processing under DTVSV Act.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Eligibility of the review petition as a pending appeal under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act).
                            2. Interpretation of "pending appeal" under the DTVSV Act.
                            3. Applicability of CBDT circulars and clarifications.
                            4. Legislative intent and purpose of the DTVSV Act.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Eligibility of the Review Petition:
                            The primary issue was whether the review petition filed by the petitioner qualifies as a "pending appeal" under the DTVSV Act. The petitioner argued that the review petition should be considered an extension of the appeal process, and thus, should be eligible under the DTVSV Act. The court noted that although the scope of review is distinct from that of an appeal, the jurisdiction of the court includes the power to modify, review, or recall its own orders. Therefore, the Special Leave Petition (SLP) could not be considered final as the review petition was pending on the cutoff date.

                            2. Interpretation of "Pending Appeal":
                            The court examined the interpretation of "pending appeal" as defined in Section 2(1)(j) of the DTVSV Act. The respondent contended that no appeal, writ petition, or SLP was pending as of the specified date, making the petitioner ineligible. However, the court emphasized a broader interpretation, highlighting that the DTVSV Act aims to resolve disputes pending at various appellate and review stages. The court concluded that the review petition should be included within the definition of a pending appeal, thereby allowing the petitioner to avail the benefits of the DTVSV Act.

                            3. Applicability of CBDT Circulars and Clarifications:
                            The court referred to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) circulars, which clarified that proceedings such as arbitration and miscellaneous applications pending on the cutoff date could meet the requirements of Section 2(1)(j). The court held that the department is bound by these circulars and cannot take a contrary position. The inclusion of arbitration proceedings and miscellaneous applications under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme indicated a relaxation of the strict interpretation of Section 2(1)(j), supporting the inclusion of the review petition as a pending proceeding.

                            4. Legislative Intent and Purpose:
                            The court underscored the legislative intent behind the DTVSV Act, which is to reduce tax disputes and generate timely revenue. The Act is characterized as a beneficial and remedial statute, designed to provide a mechanism for resolving pending income tax litigation. The court emphasized that a restrictive interpretation of the Act, as suggested by the respondent, would contradict the scheme's purpose. The court concluded that the Act intended to provide a resolution for disputes pending at various stages, including review petitions.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order that rejected the petitioner's declaration under the DTVSV Act. It directed the respondent to accept the revised declaration form filed by the petitioner and process it in accordance with the DTVSV Act, thereby recognizing the review petition as a pending appeal eligible for the scheme's benefits. The decision aligns with the Act's objective to settle disputes and facilitate timely revenue collection.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found