Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on hold the auction of the immovable asset of the Corporate Debtor and consider the proposal to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern was dismissed. The appellant's resolution plan was previously rejected, and the orders affirming the rejection were not challenged, attaining finality. The relief sought was barred by the principle of res judicata as it had already been denied by the NCLAT. The appellant relinquished the right to question the appointment of the liquidator or seek the requested relief due to the failure to challenge the rejection of the resolution plan. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on hold the auction of the immovable asset of the Corporate Debtor and consider the proposal to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern was dismissed. The appellant's resolution plan was previously rejected, and the orders affirming the rejection were not challenged, attaining finality. The relief sought was barred by the principle of res judicata as it had already been denied by the NCLAT. The appellant relinquished the right to question the appointment of the liquidator or seek the requested relief due to the failure to challenge the rejection of the resolution plan. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
