<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rejected resolution plan barred from halting asset auction due to principle of res judicata.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83314</link>
    <description>The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on hold the auction of the immovable asset of the Corporate Debtor and consider the proposal to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern was dismissed. The appellant&#039;s resolution plan was previously rejected, and the orders affirming the rejection were not challenged, attaining finality. The relief sought was barred by the principle of res judicata as it had already been denied by the NCLAT. The appellant relinquished the right to question the appointment of the liquidator or seek the requested relief due to the failure to challenge the rejection of the resolution plan. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=778824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rejected resolution plan barred from halting asset auction due to principle of res judicata.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83314</link>
      <description>The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on hold the auction of the immovable asset of the Corporate Debtor and consider the proposal to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern was dismissed. The appellant&#039;s resolution plan was previously rejected, and the orders affirming the rejection were not challenged, attaining finality. The relief sought was barred by the principle of res judicata as it had already been denied by the NCLAT. The appellant relinquished the right to question the appointment of the liquidator or seek the requested relief due to the failure to challenge the rejection of the resolution plan. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:50:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>