Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on hold the auction of the immovable asset of the Corporate Debtor and consider the proposal to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern was dismissed. The appellant's resolution plan was previously rejected, and the orders affirming the rejection were not challenged, attaining finality. The relief sought was barred by the principle of res judicata as it had already been denied by the NCLAT. The appellant relinquished the right to question the appointment of the liquidator or seek the requested relief due to the failure to challenge the rejection of the resolution plan. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The application seeking direction to the liquidator to put on hold the auction of the immovable asset of the Corporate Debtor and consider the proposal to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern was dismissed. The appellant's resolution plan was previously rejected, and the orders affirming the rejection were not challenged, attaining finality. The relief sought was barred by the principle of res judicata as it had already been denied by the NCLAT. The appellant relinquished the right to question the appointment of the liquidator or seek the requested relief due to the failure to challenge the rejection of the resolution plan. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
