Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating Officer u/s 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, found non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 by the company and its directors. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officers in default, totaling Rs. 20,000, as prescribed u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty amount is to be paid online within 90 days of receiving the order, and proof of payment is to be submitted to the office.
The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating Officer u/s 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, found non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 by the company and its directors. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officers in default, totaling Rs. 20,000, as prescribed u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty amount is to be paid online within 90 days of receiving the order, and proof of payment is to be submitted to the office.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
