Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating Officer u/s 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, found non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 by the company and its directors. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officers in default, totaling Rs. 20,000, as prescribed u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty amount is to be paid online within 90 days of receiving the order, and proof of payment is to be submitted to the office.
The Registrar of Companies, Chennai, acting as the Adjudicating Officer u/s 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, found non-compliance with Rule 14(6) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 by the company and its directors. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the company and Rs. 10,000 on the officers in default, totaling Rs. 20,000, as prescribed u/s 450 of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty amount is to be paid online within 90 days of receiving the order, and proof of payment is to be submitted to the office.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
