Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Respondent-authorities failed to communicate reasons for retaining books of accounts and documents beyond statutory period of 30 days from assessment order as mandated u/s 132(8). Petitioner was deprived of opportunity to raise objections before Central Board of Direct Taxes u/s 132(10). Court held that non-communication of reasons for retention renders further retention illegal and invalid as per precedents. Respondents directed to return seized books and documents forthwith to petitioner.
Respondent-authorities failed to communicate reasons for retaining books of accounts and documents beyond statutory period of 30 days from assessment order as mandated u/s 132(8). Petitioner was deprived of opportunity to raise objections before Central Board of Direct Taxes u/s 132(10). Court held that non-communication of reasons for retention renders further retention illegal and invalid as per precedents. Respondents directed to return seized books and documents forthwith to petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
