Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for assessing Long Term Capital Gain on sale of land in Financial Year 2005-06. Assessing Officer (AO) adopted full value consideration u/s 50C(1) without issuing show cause notice or allowing cost of acquisition. Assessee claimed exemption u/s 54B. Appellate Tribunal held AO unjustified in making addition without allowing cost of acquisition or ascertaining fair market value as on 01.04.1981. Registered valuer reported guideline value lower than value adopted by AO, requiring verification. Fair market value to be determined u/s 50C(2). Matter remanded to AO for fresh adjudication considering cost of acquisition, fair market value u/s 50C(2), and exemption claim u/s 54B after giving assessee opportunity of hearing.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for assessing Long Term Capital Gain on sale of land in Financial Year 2005-06. Assessing Officer (AO) adopted full value consideration u/s 50C(1) without issuing show cause notice or allowing cost of acquisition. Assessee claimed exemption u/s 54B. Appellate Tribunal held AO unjustified in making addition without allowing cost of acquisition or ascertaining fair market value as on 01.04.1981. Registered valuer reported guideline value lower than value adopted by AO, requiring verification. Fair market value to be determined u/s 50C(2). Matter remanded to AO for fresh adjudication considering cost of acquisition, fair market value u/s 50C(2), and exemption claim u/s 54B after giving assessee opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
