AO must reassess long term capital gain on land sale after failing to allow acquisition costs and determine fair market value under Section 50C

ITAT Indore remanded the case back to AO for fresh adjudication of long term capital gain assessment on land sale. The tribunal found AO erred by adopting full valuation consideration under Section 50C(1) without allowing cost of acquisition, failing to issue show cause notice, and not determining fair market value under Section 50C(2) when assessee disputed the valuation. The registered valuer's report showed guideline value lower than AO's adopted consideration. AO was directed to verify cost of acquisition, determine fair market value, and examine exemption claim under Section 54B after providing proper hearing opportunity.

---

---

Issues:
- Assessment of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of land
- Validity of notice issued under section 148
- Adoption of full value consideration by Assessing Officer
- Allowance of cost of acquisition or fair market value
- Claim of exemption under section 54B of the Act

Analysis:
The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT INDORE, delivered by Shri Vijay Pal Rao, JM, pertains to three appeals by individual co-owners of land against orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The appeals were clubbed together as they arose from the same transaction of sale of land. The assessee(s) contended that the land was sold in the Financial Year 2005-06, challenging the reopening of the case. The Assessing Officer (A.O) assessed Long Term Capital Gain for the assessment year 2013-14. The assessee(s) challenged this before CIT(A) but were unsuccessful.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee's representative argued that the agreements for sale were unregistered and the consideration was in cash, citing relevant case law. The representative also disputed the full value consideration adopted by the A.O, claiming it was not as per the guideline value of the area. The representative sought admission of a valuation report as additional evidence and claimed exemption under section 54B of the Act. The Tribunal noted that the A.O did not issue a show cause notice regarding the full value consideration under Section 50C(1) and did not allow the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal found the A.O's order unsustainable and set aside the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the A.O to consider the cost of acquisition and fair market value in accordance with Section 50C(2). The claim for exemption under section 54B was also to be verified and adjudicated.

The Departmental Representative argued that the assessee's claims were not valid due to lack of registered agreements and non-filing of the return of income in response to the notice u/s 148. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and material on record, found that the A.O's assessment lacked justification in assessing the entire sale consideration without allowing the cost of acquisition. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the fair market value and cost of acquisition, and verification of the exemption claim under section 54B. Consequently, all three appeals of the assessee(s) were allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the judgment addressed issues related to the assessment of Long Term Capital Gain, validity of notice under section 148, adoption of full value consideration, allowance of cost of acquisition or fair market value, and claim of exemption under section 54B of the Act, providing detailed analysis and directions for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer.

---