Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assessee failed to substantiate the difference between purchases shown in its Profit and Loss Account and TCS reflected in Form 26AS. Sample bills showed invoices raised in sister concerns' names with assessee's PAN, and payments reflected in sister concerns' bank accounts. Lower authorities ignored vital documents produced. ITAT restored the issue to AO, directing opportunity to assessee to substantiate that purchases were made by sister concerns reflecting in their accounts, paid from their bank accounts. AO may ask assessee to furnish voluminous details before verification unit and call report. AO to decide as per facts and law after due opportunity to assessee, who must appear without adjournment, else AO can pass appropriate order. Grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
Assessee failed to substantiate the difference between purchases shown in its Profit and Loss Account and TCS reflected in Form 26AS. Sample bills showed invoices raised in sister concerns' names with assessee's PAN, and payments reflected in sister concerns' bank accounts. Lower authorities ignored vital documents produced. ITAT restored the issue to AO, directing opportunity to assessee to substantiate that purchases were made by sister concerns reflecting in their accounts, paid from their bank accounts. AO may ask assessee to furnish voluminous details before verification unit and call report. AO to decide as per facts and law after due opportunity to assessee, who must appear without adjournment, else AO can pass appropriate order. Grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.