Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Assessee failed to substantiate the difference between purchases shown in its Profit and Loss Account and TCS reflected in Form 26AS. Sample bills showed invoices raised in sister concerns' names with assessee's PAN, and payments reflected in sister concerns' bank accounts. Lower authorities ignored vital documents produced. ITAT restored the issue to AO, directing opportunity to assessee to substantiate that purchases were made by sister concerns reflecting in their accounts, paid from their bank accounts. AO may ask assessee to furnish voluminous details before verification unit and call report. AO to decide as per facts and law after due opportunity to assessee, who must appear without adjournment, else AO can pass appropriate order. Grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
