Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Assessee failed to substantiate the difference between purchases shown in its Profit and Loss Account and TCS reflected in Form 26AS. Sample bills showed invoices raised in sister concerns' names with assessee's PAN, and payments reflected in sister concerns' bank accounts. Lower authorities ignored vital documents produced. ITAT restored the issue to AO, directing opportunity to assessee to substantiate that purchases were made by sister concerns reflecting in their accounts, paid from their bank accounts. AO may ask assessee to furnish voluminous details before verification unit and call report. AO to decide as per facts and law after due opportunity to assessee, who must appear without adjournment, else AO can pass appropriate order. Grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
Assessee failed to substantiate the difference between purchases shown in its Profit and Loss Account and TCS reflected in Form 26AS. Sample bills showed invoices raised in sister concerns' names with assessee's PAN, and payments reflected in sister concerns' bank accounts. Lower authorities ignored vital documents produced. ITAT restored the issue to AO, directing opportunity to assessee to substantiate that purchases were made by sister concerns reflecting in their accounts, paid from their bank accounts. AO may ask assessee to furnish voluminous details before verification unit and call report. AO to decide as per facts and law after due opportunity to assessee, who must appear without adjournment, else AO can pass appropriate order. Grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.