Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Rejection of the appellant's proposal for settlement u/s 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) decision upholding the denial of another opportunity to submit a Section 12A proposal. The key points are: 80.22% of CoC members had already voted against the appellant's settlement proposal, deeming it unfeasible and commercially unviable. Simultaneously, the Successful Resolution Applicant's (SRA) resolution plan was approved by 80.84% of the CoC. The NCLAT emphasized the primacy of the CoC's commercial wisdom, stating that the suspended management cannot insist on consideration of its proposal when the CoC has categorically decided against it. The Tribunal also noted the time-sensitive nature of IBC proceedings and the need to avoid indefinite delays, as the resolution plan had been pending for nearly four years. Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's decision to disallow further opportunities for the appellant to submit a Section 12A proposal.
Rejection of the appellant's proposal for settlement u/s 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) decision upholding the denial of another opportunity to submit a Section 12A proposal. The key points are: 80.22% of CoC members had already voted against the appellant's settlement proposal, deeming it unfeasible and commercially unviable. Simultaneously, the Successful Resolution Applicant's (SRA) resolution plan was approved by 80.84% of the CoC. The NCLAT emphasized the primacy of the CoC's commercial wisdom, stating that the suspended management cannot insist on consideration of its proposal when the CoC has categorically decided against it. The Tribunal also noted the time-sensitive nature of IBC proceedings and the need to avoid indefinite delays, as the resolution plan had been pending for nearly four years. Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the Adjudicating Authority's decision to disallow further opportunities for the appellant to submit a Section 12A proposal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
