<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Insolvency Proposal Rejected: Tribunal Upholds Creditors&#039; Decision, Stresses Timely Resolution Process Under IBC.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82868</link>
    <description>Rejection of the appellant&#039;s proposal for settlement u/s 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal&#039;s (NCLAT) decision upholding the denial of another opportunity to submit a Section 12A proposal. The key points are: 80.22% of CoC members had already voted against the appellant&#039;s settlement proposal, deeming it unfeasible and commercially unviable. Simultaneously, the Successful Resolution Applicant&#039;s (SRA) resolution plan was approved by 80.84% of the CoC. The NCLAT emphasized the primacy of the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom, stating that the suspended management cannot insist on consideration of its proposal when the CoC has categorically decided against it.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Insolvency Proposal Rejected: Tribunal Upholds Creditors&#039; Decision, Stresses Timely Resolution Process Under IBC.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82868</link>
      <description>Rejection of the appellant&#039;s proposal for settlement u/s 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal&#039;s (NCLAT) decision upholding the denial of another opportunity to submit a Section 12A proposal. The key points are: 80.22% of CoC members had already voted against the appellant&#039;s settlement proposal, deeming it unfeasible and commercially unviable. Simultaneously, the Successful Resolution Applicant&#039;s (SRA) resolution plan was approved by 80.84% of the CoC. The NCLAT emphasized the primacy of the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom, stating that the suspended management cannot insist on consideration of its proposal when the CoC has categorically decided against it.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>