Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported 'Milled Glass Powder' for manufacturing and exporting 'Bead glass' used in 'Electron Guns'. During August 2004 to March 2006, the actual waste generated exceeded the Standard Input-Output Norms (SION) of 4.76%. The Development Commissioner granted ad-hoc approval for 20.34% waste for six months, further extended by the Board of Approvals. Despite excess wastage over SION, the appellant fulfilled export obligations without diverting imported goods. Merely exceeding wastage norms without evidence of diversion cannot lead to a presumption of improper accounting or demand of duty under Customs Act Sections 65(2)(b) and 72(1)(d). The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and interest, holding that excess wastage alone cannot treat imported goods as not used for manufacturing exports when obligations are met.
The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported 'Milled Glass Powder' for manufacturing and exporting 'Bead glass' used in 'Electron Guns'. During August 2004 to March 2006, the actual waste generated exceeded the Standard Input-Output Norms (SION) of 4.76%. The Development Commissioner granted ad-hoc approval for 20.34% waste for six months, further extended by the Board of Approvals. Despite excess wastage over SION, the appellant fulfilled export obligations without diverting imported goods. Merely exceeding wastage norms without evidence of diversion cannot lead to a presumption of improper accounting or demand of duty under Customs Act Sections 65(2)(b) and 72(1)(d). The Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and interest, holding that excess wastage alone cannot treat imported goods as not used for manufacturing exports when obligations are met.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
