Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of error in filing GSTR-3B, supported by certificate. Considering respondent's submission, Court set aside four assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21, remanding matters to State Tax Officer for fresh consideration. Condition imposed on petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax amount within four weeks for setting aside orders to take effect. Petition disposed of by way of remand.
Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of error in filing GSTR-3B, supported by certificate. Considering respondent's submission, Court set aside four assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21, remanding matters to State Tax Officer for fresh consideration. Condition imposed on petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax amount within four weeks for setting aside orders to take effect. Petition disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
