https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82730 Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of error in filing GSTR-3B, supported by certificate. Considering respondent's submission, Court set aside four assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21, remanding matters to State Tax Officer for fresh consideration. Condition imposed on petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax amount within four weeks for setting aside orders to take effect. Petition disposed of by way of remand. en-us Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82730 Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of error in filing GSTR-3B, supported by certificate. Considering respondent's submission, Court set aside four assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21, remanding matters to State Tax Officer for fresh consideration. Condition imposed on petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax amount within four weeks for setting aside orders to take effect. Petition disposed of by way of remand. Highlights GST Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82730