Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of error in filing GSTR-3B, supported by certificate. Considering respondent's submission, Court set aside four assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21, remanding matters to State Tax Officer for fresh consideration. Condition imposed on petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax amount within four weeks for setting aside orders to take effect. Petition disposed of by way of remand.
Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of error in filing GSTR-3B, supported by certificate. Considering respondent's submission, Court set aside four assessment orders for 2017-18 to 2020-21, remanding matters to State Tax Officer for fresh consideration. Condition imposed on petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax amount within four weeks for setting aside orders to take effect. Petition disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
