Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the objections raised by the petitioner. The issues involved input tax credit mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-5, and discrepancies between GSTR-1 and e-way bill outward supplies. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to consider the petitioner's objections, provide an opportunity for personal hearing, and pass a speaking order within twelve weeks, in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the objections raised by the petitioner. The issues involved input tax credit mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-5, and discrepancies between GSTR-1 and e-way bill outward supplies. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to consider the petitioner's objections, provide an opportunity for personal hearing, and pass a speaking order within twelve weeks, in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
