https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82724 The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the objections raised by the petitioner. The issues involved input tax credit mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-5, and discrepancies between GSTR-1 and e-way bill outward supplies. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to consider the petitioner's objections, provide an opportunity for personal hearing, and pass a speaking order within twelve weeks, in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand. en-us Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82724 The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the objections raised by the petitioner. The issues involved input tax credit mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-5, and discrepancies between GSTR-1 and e-way bill outward supplies. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to consider the petitioner's objections, provide an opportunity for personal hearing, and pass a speaking order within twelve weeks, in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand. Highlights GST Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:32:36 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82724