Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed the validity of an assessment order passed u/s 153C, considering the issue of limitation. The assessee raised the plea that the assessment year 2004-05 was beyond the six-year block period for assessment u/s 153C. Although the order bore the date 30.12.2011, it was issued and dispatched on 02.01.2012 as per the post office report. Since the assessee raised this plea for the first time during the appeal hearing, the ITAT remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for proper verification and adjudication, along with other set-aside issues. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed the validity of an assessment order passed u/s 153C, considering the issue of limitation. The assessee raised the plea that the assessment year 2004-05 was beyond the six-year block period for assessment u/s 153C. Although the order bore the date 30.12.2011, it was issued and dispatched on 02.01.2012 as per the post office report. Since the assessee raised this plea for the first time during the appeal hearing, the ITAT remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for proper verification and adjudication, along with other set-aside issues. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
