Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (10) TMI 851 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessment order dispatched after block period deadline creates limitation issues requiring fresh adjudication under section 153C ITAT Indore held that assessment order dated 30.12.2011 but dispatched on 02.01.2012 under section 153C for assessment year 2004-05 raised limitation ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Assessment order dispatched after block period deadline creates limitation issues requiring fresh adjudication under section 153C

                            ITAT Indore held that assessment order dated 30.12.2011 but dispatched on 02.01.2012 under section 153C for assessment year 2004-05 raised limitation issues. Since assessee argued the assessment year exceeded the six-year block period, and this plea was raised for the first time during appeal hearing, the tribunal remanded the matter to AO for proper verification and fresh adjudication of limitation and other issues. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Validity of the assessment order under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Additions made on a protective basis and substantive additions in the hands of another individual.
                            3. Violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of opportunity for cross-examination.
                            4. Consideration of the assessment year 2004-05 as beyond the block period for assessment under Section 153C.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of the Assessment Order under Section 153C:

                            The assessee challenged the assessment order's validity, arguing it was barred by limitation under Section 153C. The order was dated 30.12.2011 but allegedly dispatched on 02.01.2012, beyond the limitation period. The department contended that the order was handed over to the postal department on 30.12.2011 under the "Buy Now Pay Later" (BNPL) scheme, which was within the limitation period. The Tribunal, relying on the Gujarat High Court's judgment in Rajesh Sunderdas Vaswani v. Dy. CIT, held that the handing over of the order to the postal department on 30.12.2011 constituted issuance within the limitation period. Thus, the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's contention regarding the limitation.

                            2. Additions Made on Protective Basis:

                            The assessee contested the protective additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO), arguing that substantive additions were made in the hands of another individual, Shri Arvind Joshi. The Tribunal noted that in a related case, the matter was set aside for fresh adjudication due to overlapping issues. Consequently, the Tribunal decided that the protective additions in the assessee's case should also be reconsidered in light of the outcome of the proceedings in Shri Arvind Joshi's case. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication.

                            3. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice:

                            The assessee argued that the AO violated principles of natural justice by not allowing cross-examination of witnesses whose statements were used as evidence. The Tribunal acknowledged this violation, noting that statements and reports were used without giving the assessee a chance to rebut them. The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court's ruling in Andaman Timber Industries v. Commissioner of Central Excise, emphasizing the necessity of cross-examination for a fair trial. The Tribunal set aside the assessment order and remanded the matter to the AO, directing that the assessee be allowed to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence used against them.

                            4. Assessment Year 2004-05 Beyond the Block Period:

                            The assessee claimed that the assessment year 2004-05 was beyond the block period for assessment under Section 153C. The Tribunal noted that this issue was raised for the first time during the appeal hearing. The Tribunal decided that this matter should be considered by the AO during the fresh adjudication process, along with other issues.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal remanded the matters concerning the validity of the assessment order, protective additions, and the alleged violation of natural justice to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal directed that the assessee be given an appropriate opportunity to present their case, including cross-examining witnesses and responding to evidence. The issue of whether the assessment year 2004-05 is beyond the block period was also remanded for verification and adjudication by the AO. The cross-appeals filed by both the assessee and the revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found