Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. The addition u/s 68 was rightly deleted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal admitted additional evidence u/r 46A, considering the assessee's office was in a COVID-19 containment zone. The CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition u/s 68 for a loan received, as the assessing officer accepted the transaction's genuineness based on overwhelming evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding no infirmity in deleting the additions where the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions.
The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. The addition u/s 68 was rightly deleted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal admitted additional evidence u/r 46A, considering the assessee's office was in a COVID-19 containment zone. The CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition u/s 68 for a loan received, as the assessing officer accepted the transaction's genuineness based on overwhelming evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding no infirmity in deleting the additions where the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
