<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Director&#039;s share capital &amp; loan receipts verified, additions deleted on proven identity/ creditworthiness/ genuineness.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82356</link>
    <description>The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. The addition u/s 68 was rightly deleted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal admitted additional evidence u/r 46A, considering the assessee&#039;s office was in a COVID-19 containment zone. The CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition u/s 68 for a loan received, as the assessing officer accepted the transaction&#039;s genuineness based on overwhelming evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, finding no infirmity in deleting the additions where the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:18:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Director&#039;s share capital &amp; loan receipts verified, additions deleted on proven identity/ creditworthiness/ genuineness.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82356</link>
      <description>The assessee successfully discharged the onus u/s 68 regarding share capital introduced by the company director, a major shareholder, proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. The addition u/s 68 was rightly deleted by the CIT(A). The Tribunal admitted additional evidence u/r 46A, considering the assessee&#039;s office was in a COVID-19 containment zone. The CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition u/s 68 for a loan received, as the assessing officer accepted the transaction&#039;s genuineness based on overwhelming evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, finding no infirmity in deleting the additions where the assessee proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>