Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency commencement date, while for non-related parties, it is one year. If the outstanding amount pertains to a period beyond two years prior to the CIRP commencement date for a related party transaction, relief u/s 43 of the IBC would not be available. However, alternative actions, including u/s 66 of the IBC, may be pursued. The NCLAT order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.
The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency commencement date, while for non-related parties, it is one year. If the outstanding amount pertains to a period beyond two years prior to the CIRP commencement date for a related party transaction, relief u/s 43 of the IBC would not be available. However, alternative actions, including u/s 66 of the IBC, may be pursued. The NCLAT order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.