<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court limits lookback period for related party transactions under IBC to 2 years, non-related parties 1 year.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82343</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency commencement date, while for non-related parties, it is one year. If the outstanding amount pertains to a period beyond two years prior to the CIRP commencement date for a related party transaction, relief u/s 43 of the IBC would not be available. However, alternative actions, including u/s 66 of the IBC, may be pursued. The NCLAT order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=773999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court limits lookback period for related party transactions under IBC to 2 years, non-related parties 1 year.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82343</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the lookback period for related party transactions u/s 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is two years before the insolvency commencement date, while for non-related parties, it is one year. If the outstanding amount pertains to a period beyond two years prior to the CIRP commencement date for a related party transaction, relief u/s 43 of the IBC would not be available. However, alternative actions, including u/s 66 of the IBC, may be pursued. The NCLAT order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:14:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>