Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the addition of gross profit (GP) shown by increasing the GP rate, the ITAT found the CIT(A)'s findings logical and justified, as the GP rate was lower than the previous year's rate. On the addition u/s 69A for cash deposited in the bank account, the ITAT accepted the CIT(A)'s reliance on non-jurisdictional High Court decisions in the absence of a jurisdictional High Court order. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that without evidence of bogus sales, sales from accepted purchases and stock cannot be rejected. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal on both grounds.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the addition of gross profit (GP) shown by increasing the GP rate, the ITAT found the CIT(A)'s findings logical and justified, as the GP rate was lower than the previous year's rate. On the addition u/s 69A for cash deposited in the bank account, the ITAT accepted the CIT(A)'s reliance on non-jurisdictional High Court decisions in the absence of a jurisdictional High Court order. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that without evidence of bogus sales, sales from accepted purchases and stock cannot be rejected. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal on both grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.