<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Business profits fairly accepted; unexplained cash deposits allowed based on non-jurisdictional court rulings.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82263</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the addition of gross profit (GP) shown by increasing the GP rate, the ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s findings logical and justified, as the GP rate was lower than the previous year&#039;s rate. On the addition u/s 69A for cash deposited in the bank account, the ITAT accepted the CIT(A)&#039;s reliance on non-jurisdictional High Court decisions in the absence of a jurisdictional High Court order. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that without evidence of bogus sales, sales from accepted purchases and stock cannot be rejected. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:38:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Business profits fairly accepted; unexplained cash deposits allowed based on non-jurisdictional court rulings.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82263</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer. Regarding the addition of gross profit (GP) shown by increasing the GP rate, the ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s findings logical and justified, as the GP rate was lower than the previous year&#039;s rate. On the addition u/s 69A for cash deposited in the bank account, the ITAT accepted the CIT(A)&#039;s reliance on non-jurisdictional High Court decisions in the absence of a jurisdictional High Court order. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that without evidence of bogus sales, sales from accepted purchases and stock cannot be rejected. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:38:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>