Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Addition u/s 69A - AIR information revealed cash deposits in assessee's savings bank account - assessee applied Section 44AD of the Act on business income. Held: Assessee was a contractor before appointment, and Revenue did not dispute this. Section 44AD allows computing business profits on presumptive basis for eligible businesses at 8% of turnover. Assessee's business fell under eligible category. AO did not provide evidence that cash deposits were not from business. In absence of contrary evidence, assessee's business was eligible u/s 44AD, and cash deposits were from business. 10% profit offered by assessee u/s 44AD accepted. CIT(A)'s order failed, assessee's grounds allowed.
Addition u/s 69A - AIR information revealed cash deposits in assessee's savings bank account - assessee applied Section 44AD of the Act on business income. Held: Assessee was a contractor before appointment, and Revenue did not dispute this. Section 44AD allows computing business profits on presumptive basis for eligible businesses at 8% of turnover. Assessee's business fell under eligible category. AO did not provide evidence that cash deposits were not from business. In absence of contrary evidence, assessee's business was eligible u/s 44AD, and cash deposits were from business. 10% profit offered by assessee u/s 44AD accepted. CIT(A)'s order failed, assessee's grounds allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.