<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash deposits in savings account of a contractor - Revenue failed to rebut presumptive income u/s 44AD.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82189</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69A - AIR information revealed cash deposits in assessee&#039;s savings bank account - assessee applied Section 44AD of the Act on business income. Held: Assessee was a contractor before appointment, and Revenue did not dispute this. Section 44AD allows computing business profits on presumptive basis for eligible businesses at 8% of turnover. Assessee&#039;s business fell under eligible category. AO did not provide evidence that cash deposits were not from business. In absence of contrary evidence, assessee&#039;s business was eligible u/s 44AD, and cash deposits were from business. 10% profit offered by assessee u/s 44AD accepted. CIT(A)&#039;s order failed, assessee&#039;s grounds allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:43:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=772715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash deposits in savings account of a contractor - Revenue failed to rebut presumptive income u/s 44AD.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82189</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69A - AIR information revealed cash deposits in assessee&#039;s savings bank account - assessee applied Section 44AD of the Act on business income. Held: Assessee was a contractor before appointment, and Revenue did not dispute this. Section 44AD allows computing business profits on presumptive basis for eligible businesses at 8% of turnover. Assessee&#039;s business fell under eligible category. AO did not provide evidence that cash deposits were not from business. In absence of contrary evidence, assessee&#039;s business was eligible u/s 44AD, and cash deposits were from business. 10% profit offered by assessee u/s 44AD accepted. CIT(A)&#039;s order failed, assessee&#039;s grounds allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:43:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>