Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The assessee's contribution to the Employees Group Gratuity Scheme was disallowed solely due to it being paid to an unapproved Gratuity Fund. However, it was held that the approval granted to the erstwhile company's Gratuity Fund automatically vested with the assessee upon the change of name. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to deduct the expenditure towards the contribution made to the Employees Gratuity Fund. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment on interest on outstanding receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs), it was held that the ratio laid down in the Delhi Tribunal case applied. The assessee's margin being significantly higher than the comparables, the adjustment had no basis. The argument that interest on outstanding receivables cannot be considered an international transaction was dismissed due to the amendment in Explanation 1(c) of Section 92B. Consequently, the ground raised by the assessee was allowed.
The assessee's contribution to the Employees Group Gratuity Scheme was disallowed solely due to it being paid to an unapproved Gratuity Fund. However, it was held that the approval granted to the erstwhile company's Gratuity Fund automatically vested with the assessee upon the change of name. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to deduct the expenditure towards the contribution made to the Employees Gratuity Fund. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment on interest on outstanding receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs), it was held that the ratio laid down in the Delhi Tribunal case applied. The assessee's margin being significantly higher than the comparables, the adjustment had no basis. The argument that interest on outstanding receivables cannot be considered an international transaction was dismissed due to the amendment in Explanation 1(c) of Section 92B. Consequently, the ground raised by the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
