<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gratuity Fund Deduction Allowed After Name Change; Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Receivables Rejected Due to Higher Margin.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82007</link>
    <description>The assessee&#039;s contribution to the Employees Group Gratuity Scheme was disallowed solely due to it being paid to an unapproved Gratuity Fund. However, it was held that the approval granted to the erstwhile company&#039;s Gratuity Fund automatically vested with the assessee upon the change of name. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to deduct the expenditure towards the contribution made to the Employees Gratuity Fund. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment on interest on outstanding receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs), it was held that the ratio laid down in the Delhi Tribunal case applied. The assessee&#039;s margin being significantly higher than the comparables, the adjustment had no basis. The argument that interest on outstanding .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:08:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:08:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=771958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Gratuity Fund Deduction Allowed After Name Change; Transfer Pricing Adjustment on Receivables Rejected Due to Higher Margin.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82007</link>
      <description>The assessee&#039;s contribution to the Employees Group Gratuity Scheme was disallowed solely due to it being paid to an unapproved Gratuity Fund. However, it was held that the approval granted to the erstwhile company&#039;s Gratuity Fund automatically vested with the assessee upon the change of name. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to deduct the expenditure towards the contribution made to the Employees Gratuity Fund. Regarding the transfer pricing adjustment on interest on outstanding receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs), it was held that the ratio laid down in the Delhi Tribunal case applied. The assessee&#039;s margin being significantly higher than the comparables, the adjustment had no basis. The argument that interest on outstanding .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:08:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>