Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court set aside the order u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, finding that the authority took a restrictive and conservative approach in not noticing the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) circular dated 09.06.2015 regarding condonation of delay up to six years. The matter was remitted back to the authority to reconsider, taking note of the CBDT circular. The authority must take a holistic view and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, as the period sought to be condoned is within six years, and the restriction on non-condonation applies only beyond six years.
The High Court set aside the order u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, finding that the authority took a restrictive and conservative approach in not noticing the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) circular dated 09.06.2015 regarding condonation of delay up to six years. The matter was remitted back to the authority to reconsider, taking note of the CBDT circular. The authority must take a holistic view and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, as the period sought to be condoned is within six years, and the restriction on non-condonation applies only beyond six years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
