Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The High Court set aside the order u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, finding that the authority took a restrictive and conservative approach in not noticing the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) circular dated 09.06.2015 regarding condonation of delay up to six years. The matter was remitted back to the authority to reconsider, taking note of the CBDT circular. The authority must take a holistic view and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, as the period sought to be condoned is within six years, and the restriction on non-condonation applies only beyond six years.
The High Court set aside the order u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, finding that the authority took a restrictive and conservative approach in not noticing the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) circular dated 09.06.2015 regarding condonation of delay up to six years. The matter was remitted back to the authority to reconsider, taking note of the CBDT circular. The authority must take a holistic view and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, as the period sought to be condoned is within six years, and the restriction on non-condonation applies only beyond six years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
