Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Tribunal examined allegations of fraudulent transactions u/s 66 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against corporate debtor. Conversion of share application money to unsecured loan, conspicuous investments into related parties, and unaccounted rental income were scrutinized. Tribunal held fraud must be established beyond reasonable doubt, mere suspicion insufficient. Conversion of share money to debt not fraudulent. Investments in related parties explained, not prejudicial, complied with Companies Act. Cash withdrawals for salaries before 2016, not proximate to insolvency. Rental income agreements not proven fraudulent. Resolution Professional failed to establish fraudulent trading case u/s 66. Application dismissed due to lack of evidence of fraud.
Tribunal examined allegations of fraudulent transactions u/s 66 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against corporate debtor. Conversion of share application money to unsecured loan, conspicuous investments into related parties, and unaccounted rental income were scrutinized. Tribunal held fraud must be established beyond reasonable doubt, mere suspicion insufficient. Conversion of share money to debt not fraudulent. Investments in related parties explained, not prejudicial, complied with Companies Act. Cash withdrawals for salaries before 2016, not proximate to insolvency. Rental income agreements not proven fraudulent. Resolution Professional failed to establish fraudulent trading case u/s 66. Application dismissed due to lack of evidence of fraud.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.