Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Duty drawback recovery case involving merchant exporter manufacturing DOC using duty-paid Hexane. Petitioner did not issue ARE-2 while removing DOC, but Commissioner (Appeals) held non-issuance would not affect duty-free Hexane benefit u/r 19(2). No intention established by Adjudicating Authority for erroneous drawback claim. Commissioner (Appeals) found drawback claim legality valid as exporter did not unduly get double benefit. Revisional Authority failed to consider 1% drawback rate related to customs portion only, not excise. Non-issuance of ARE-2 not a breach of rules. Impugned order by Revisional Authority levying penalty quashed, Commissioner (Appeals) order deleting penalty restored. Petition allowed.
Duty drawback recovery case involving merchant exporter manufacturing DOC using duty-paid Hexane. Petitioner did not issue ARE-2 while removing DOC, but Commissioner (Appeals) held non-issuance would not affect duty-free Hexane benefit u/r 19(2). No intention established by Adjudicating Authority for erroneous drawback claim. Commissioner (Appeals) found drawback claim legality valid as exporter did not unduly get double benefit. Revisional Authority failed to consider 1% drawback rate related to customs portion only, not excise. Non-issuance of ARE-2 not a breach of rules. Impugned order by Revisional Authority levying penalty quashed, Commissioner (Appeals) order deleting penalty restored. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
