<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exporter&#039;s duty-free drawback claim upheld despite non-issuance of ARE-2.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81561</link>
    <description>Duty drawback recovery case involving merchant exporter manufacturing DOC using duty-paid Hexane. Petitioner did not issue ARE-2 while removing DOC, but Commissioner (Appeals) held non-issuance would not affect duty-free Hexane benefit u/r 19(2). No intention established by Adjudicating Authority for erroneous drawback claim. Commissioner (Appeals) found drawback claim legality valid as exporter did not unduly get double benefit. Revisional Authority failed to consider 1% drawback rate related to customs portion only, not excise. Non-issuance of ARE-2 not a breach of rules. Impugned order by Revisional Authority levying penalty quashed, Commissioner (Appeals) order deleting penalty restored. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:25:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exporter&#039;s duty-free drawback claim upheld despite non-issuance of ARE-2.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81561</link>
      <description>Duty drawback recovery case involving merchant exporter manufacturing DOC using duty-paid Hexane. Petitioner did not issue ARE-2 while removing DOC, but Commissioner (Appeals) held non-issuance would not affect duty-free Hexane benefit u/r 19(2). No intention established by Adjudicating Authority for erroneous drawback claim. Commissioner (Appeals) found drawback claim legality valid as exporter did not unduly get double benefit. Revisional Authority failed to consider 1% drawback rate related to customs portion only, not excise. Non-issuance of ARE-2 not a breach of rules. Impugned order by Revisional Authority levying penalty quashed, Commissioner (Appeals) order deleting penalty restored. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:25:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>