Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP dues in 8 quarterly installments from June 2022 to March 2024. The Appellant claimed that payments made by the Corporate Debtor after CIRP commencement should be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues instead of current CIRP costs. The NCLAT held that the resolution plan's schedule for payment of pre-CIRP dues was sacrosanct and cannot be superseded. Any payments made after CIRP commencement must be appropriated towards current CIRP dues, not pre-CIRP dues. The Appellant was entitled to payment of pre-CIRP dues only as per the approved resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority's view that post-CIRP payments cannot be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues was reasonable and upheld. The appeal was dismissed.
The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP dues in 8 quarterly installments from June 2022 to March 2024. The Appellant claimed that payments made by the Corporate Debtor after CIRP commencement should be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues instead of current CIRP costs. The NCLAT held that the resolution plan's schedule for payment of pre-CIRP dues was sacrosanct and cannot be superseded. Any payments made after CIRP commencement must be appropriated towards current CIRP dues, not pre-CIRP dues. The Appellant was entitled to payment of pre-CIRP dues only as per the approved resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority's view that post-CIRP payments cannot be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues was reasonable and upheld. The appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
