https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81557 The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP dues in 8 quarterly installments from June 2022 to March 2024. The Appellant claimed that payments made by the Corporate Debtor after CIRP commencement should be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues instead of current CIRP costs. The NCLAT held that the resolution plan's schedule for payment of pre-CIRP dues was sacrosanct and cannot be superseded. Any payments made after CIRP commencement must be appropriated towards current CIRP dues, not pre-CIRP dues. The Appellant was entitled to payment of pre-CIRP dues only as per the approved resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority's view that post-CIRP payments cannot be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues was reasonable and upheld. The appeal was dismissed. en-us Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:25:51 +0530 Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:25:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81557 The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP dues in 8 quarterly installments from June 2022 to March 2024. The Appellant claimed that payments made by the Corporate Debtor after CIRP commencement should be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues instead of current CIRP costs. The NCLAT held that the resolution plan's schedule for payment of pre-CIRP dues was sacrosanct and cannot be superseded. Any payments made after CIRP commencement must be appropriated towards current CIRP dues, not pre-CIRP dues. The Appellant was entitled to payment of pre-CIRP dues only as per the approved resolution plan. The Adjudicating Authority's view that post-CIRP payments cannot be appropriated towards pre-CIRP dues was reasonable and upheld. The appeal was dismissed. Highlights IBC Sat, 21 Sep 2024 07:25:51 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81557